Equality of Citizens and Non-Citizens in the EU Essay -- Social Welfar

IntroductionThe territory of the European Union (EU) hosts roughly 500 cardinal people. atomic number 18 they all equal in their rights? Definitely not. One of legal dividing lines lies between the nationals of EU Member States (Citizen) and third-country nationals (TCNs) whose citizenship belongs to a non-EU country. Nationality t presentfore does matter in EU lawfulness it confers different statuses. The paper compares the two separate legal regimes that are applicable to EU citizens and TCNs respectively. Due to the narrow scope of this essay, the analytical focus espouse here is under four major limitations. First, legal migrants coming from outside the EU constitute several(prenominal) different categories (for instance, economic migration, family reunion or migration of students, pupils, trainees, and volunteers) in EU law, which is even more complex because of privileged TCNs who gain their status from special arrangements between their own country and the EU, furthermore Schengen visa requirements mean excess salmagundi along a different dimension. The essay deals only with non-privileged long residents (LTRs) as defined by the Council Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (LTRs Directive) . Second, two EU citizens and LTRs rights comprise several dimensions (for example, access to employment, family reunification or social grants) but this study is mainly focused on their entitlements to move and reside at bottom the territory of the EU. Third, the main concern of this paper is restrictions to the previously mentioned rights of both categories of persons. Fourth, the family members neither of Citizens nor TCNs are not part of the main body of this analysis. Subsequently, the e... ...and citizenship tests in several countries as a new way of selecting immigrants. Shift away from aftermath integration as a positive social measure and towards predominantly viewing it as a repressive im migration measure can be noticed. Works Cited1.Anton-Mathew-Morgan. In R.2.Aust. In R.3.Byers-Chesterman. In R.4.Cassese. In R.5.Crawford-Olleson. In R.6.Evans. In R.7.Fitzmaurice. In R.8.Francas presentation.9.Freestone-Salman. In R.10.http//www.nationsencyclopedia.com/United-Nations/Law-of-the-Sea.html11.http//www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_historical_perspective.htm12.Openheim. In R.13.Rio Declaration14.Sands. In R.15.Slide on The nine pillars of the common heritage of mankind.16.Slides on History17.Slides on mood swop18.Tuerk. In R.19.UN Charter20.UNHCR. In R. Equality of Citizens and Non-Citizens in the EU Essay -- Social WelfarIntroductionThe territory of the European Union (EU) hosts roughly 500 million people. Are they all equal in their rights? Definitely not. One of legal dividing lines lies between the nationals of EU Member States (Citizen) and third-country nationals (TCNs) whose citizenship belongs to a non-EU country. Nationalit y therefore does matter in EU law it confers different statuses. The paper compares the two separate legal regimes that are applicable to EU citizens and TCNs respectively. Due to the narrow scope of this essay, the analytical focus adopted here is under four major limitations. First, legal migrants coming from outside the EU constitute several different categories (for instance, economic migration, family reunion or migration of students, pupils, trainees, and volunteers) in EU law, which is even more complex because of privileged TCNs who gain their status from special arrangements between their own country and the EU, furthermore Schengen visa requirements mean additional classification along a different dimension. The essay deals only with non-privileged long-term residents (LTRs) as defined by the Council Directive 2003/109/EC concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (LTRs Directive) . Second, both EU citizens and LTRs rights comprise several dimensions (for example, access to employment, family reunification or social grants) but this study is mainly focused on their entitlements to move and reside within the territory of the EU. Third, the main concern of this paper is restrictions to the previously mentioned rights of both categories of persons. Fourth, the family members neither of Citizens nor TCNs are not part of the main body of this analysis. Subsequently, the e... ...and citizenship tests in several countries as a new way of selecting immigrants. Shift away from viewing integration as a positive social measure and towards predominantly viewing it as a repressive immigration measure can be noticed. Works Cited1.Anton-Mathew-Morgan. In R.2.Aust. In R.3.Byers-Chesterman. In R.4.Cassese. In R.5.Crawford-Olleson. In R.6.Evans. In R.7.Fitzmaurice. In R.8.Francas presentation.9.Freestone-Salman. In R.10.http//www.nationsencyclopedia.com/United-Nations/Law-of-the-Sea.html11.http//www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreem ents/convention_historical_perspective.htm12.Openheim. In R.13.Rio Declaration14.Sands. In R.15.Slide on The nine pillars of the common heritage of mankind.16.Slides on History17.Slides on Climate Change18.Tuerk. In R.19.UN Charter20.UNHCR. In R.